This post won’t contain any new insights, but it is a service to Christ to regularly mock and denounce the “Associate Professors Of Jeebus Was A Homo”. They grew fat and lazy on easy wins while turning the rulers of society against God… such rulers were never comfortable with the concept that they were given their authority for the benefit of the people, not themselves… but now that they’re going after the dirt proles in what they expected to be a mop-up operation, they’re encountering the prophets and Pawlowskis of the True And Living God!

What does the Bible say about homosexuality? For starters, Jesus wasn’t a homophobe

h ttps://www.yahoo.com/news/does-bible-homosexuality-starters-jesus-141828433.html

By Gerald West, Senior Professor of Biblical Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 9 February 2023

University of… where is KwaZulu-Natal? Congo? Wakanda? -checks- South Africa. I was close. The Dark Continent did manage to produce an African success story of an advanced civilization, which lasted exactly as long as the sour cream-colored founders who built the place were able to keep the dark tide under control.

Anyway, I am holding the Bible in my hand here, and I am thinking it says Sodom about sodomy. But perhaps a government-credentialed usurper of Wakanda, err, South Africa knows something about Christ that we Christians didn’t for 5,000 years? One wonders what his source of new knowledge is.

Pope Francis was recently asked about his views on homosexuality. He reportedly replied: “…condemning [an unrepentant Sodomite] is a sin. Criminalising people with homosexual tendencies is an injustice.”

Either “Pachemama” Frankie lied, or… Frankie lied. There really isn’t a second perspective here. The only debate Christians have ever had about homosexuals is whether we should try to cure them if they haven’t yet crossed the line into Leviticus territory.

It’s a stance that has drawn the ire of some high-ranking bishops and ordinary Catholics, both on the African continent and elsewhere in the world.

As much as I sneer about Africa, their good clergy do tend to be more… action-oriented, than their glowie peers.

Some of these Catholics may argue that Pope Francis’s approach to LGBTI matters is a misinterpretation of Scripture (or the Bible). But is it?

“God said we’d die if we eat that fruit.”

“Are you SUUURE?”

Scripture is particularly important for Christians. When church leaders refer to “the Bible” or “the Scriptures”, they usually mean “the Bible as we understand it through our theological doctrines”. The Bible is always interpreted by our churches through their particular theological lenses.

Double no. One, the Catholics use Traditions, which in the case of sodomy teach identically to Scripture. And two, the Protestants do not subordinate Scripture to “our modern culture of the moment”. The Bible is NEVER “interpreted though our theological doctrines”. It means what it says… an easy concept, unless one wants it to be hard.

As a biblical scholar, I would suggest that church leaders who use their cultures and theology to exclude homosexuals don’t read Scripture carefully. Instead, they allow their patriarchal fears to distort it, seeking to find in the Bible proof-texts that will support attitudes of exclusion.

I thought we were talking about homo? Why did he suddenly bring in patriarchy? Because sodomy and feminism both are violation of God’s natural, patriarchal order.

Mark’s Gospel, found in the New Testament, records that Jesus entered the Jerusalem temple on three occasions. First, he visited briefly, and “looked around at everything”.

Always do your recon first. It’s a Biblical principle!

On the second visit he acted, driving “out those who were buying and selling in the temple, and overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those who were selling doves” (11:15). Jesus specifically targeted those who exploited the poorest of the people coming to the temple.

Not so fast. That verse is only half the sentence; note the lack of punctuation after ‘doves’. Verse 16: “…and would not allow anyone to carry merchandise through the temple courts.” BOOM! Jesus targeted the people who turned the temple into a grift!

Et tu, Marxist Associate Professor of the Bible?

On his third visit, Jesus spent considerable time in the temple itself (11:27-13:2). He met the full array of temple leadership, including chief priests, teachers of the law and elders.

Who only… and ALL… noticed Jesus after He kicked them in the pocketbook.

Each of these leadership sectors used their interpretation of Scripture to exclude rather than to include.

No, they asked Christ by what authority He shut down their little racket. Christ pointed to John the Baptist.

The “ordinary people” (11:32 and 12:12) recognised that Jesus proclaimed a gospel of inclusion. They eagerly embraced him as he walked through the temple.

Odd that Professor Wakanda didn’t give a quote here. Let me help… (11:32) “They [temple priests] feared the people, for everyone held that John really was a prophet.” (12:12) “But they were afraid of the crowd; so they left him and went away.” I don’t see a gospel of inclusion here. I see fear of mob violence.

In Mark 12:24, Jesus addresses the Sadducees, who were the traditional high priests of ancient Israel and played an important role in the temple. Among those who confronted Jesus, they represented the group that held to a conservative theological position and used their interpretation of the Scripture to exclude. Jesus said to them: “Is this not the reason you are mistaken, that you do not understand the Scriptures or the power of God?“

I was just about to say that to author Gerald West here. Is this not the reason you are mistaken about your supposed field of expertise, that you do not understand the Scriptures or the power of God? You cannot be an expert in Scripture while simultaneously denying God who wrote it. If you understood Scripture well enough to teach it, you would understand that 1. it is true, and 2. not subject to the arbitrary reinterpretation of your paymasters.

It is pure projection, Gerald’s accusation that Christians approach the Bible intending to make it fit their preexisting agenda.

Those who would exclude homosexuals from God’s kingdom choose to ignore Jesus, turning instead to the Old Testament – most particularly to Genesis 19, the destruction of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Their interpretation of the story is that it is about homosexuality. It isn’t. It relates to hospitality.

The two angels… travelled into Sodom (Genesis 19:1) where they met Lot, Abraham’s nephew. What did Lot do? He offered hospitality.

The angels refused Lot’s hospitality. He offered, they refused, hospitality was satisfied. But Lot insisted… and what a coincidence, that the angels survived the night only because they were under Lot’s protection. (Aside from being angels, of course… Lot didn’t know.)

(19:2-4)“My lords,” he said, “please turn aside to your servant’s house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning.”

“No,” they answered, “we will spend the night in the square.”

But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house.

See? Lot wasn’t showing hospitality. He was protecting the innocent. (19:7-8) “[Lot] said, “No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing. Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”

No culture can reinterpret THAT. Although Africa tries:

The “men of Sodom” (19:4), as the Bible describes them, didn’t offer the same hospitality to these angels in disguise. Instead they sought to humiliate them (and Lot (19:9)) by threatening to rape them.

Keep lying, Gerald. Keep giving me ammo!

We know they were heterosexual because Lot, in attempting to protect himself and his guests, offered his virgin daughters to them (19:8).

And in (19:9), ““Get out of our way,” they replied.” They didn’t want women. They wanted men.

Heterosexual rape of men by men is a common act of humiliation. This is an extreme form of inhospitality.

You’re stupid, Gerald. Born stupid, raised stupid and paid to be stupid. Ehh, maybe not paid… you’re only an associate professor… maybe stupid is who you are, not just what you do.

When confronted by the inclusive gospel of Jesus and a careful reading of the story of Sodom as one about hospitality, those who disavow Pope Francis’s approach will likely jump to other Scriptures. Why?

Because Rule One of hermeneutics is that the Bible interprets itself. If you have an interpretation of one part of the Bible that contradicts another part, that means you’re doing it wrong. Here, Gerald’s claim that the Sodomites were being inhospitable is contradicted by Jude 7. “Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.” That’s not “lack of hospitality”.

That is, apparently, me “not being careful” about how I read the Bible.

Can Gerald even spell “hermeneutics”, or is he THAT stupid?

Because they have a patriarchal agenda and are looking for any Scripture that might support their position.

Et tu, Gerald? Do YOU have an agenda? Where did it come from and do you need a flashlight to show me?

But the other Scriptures they use also require careful reading. Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, for example, are not about “homosexuality” as we now understand it – as the caring, loving and sexual relationship between people of the same sex.

(Lev. 18:22) “If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, that is, wishing for better than starfish sex and not getting it, then it is an abomination and he shall be put to death. But not her. Punishing her for starfish sex would be patriarchal.”

(Lev. 20:13) “Thou shalt not miss a gay orgy in international airports, even unto monkeypox, because random sex with strangers is the foundation of loving and caring relationships.”

In Galatians 3:28…

Who is jumping Scriptures to support his agenda NOW, professor?

Paul built his theological argument on the Jew-Greek distinction, but then extended it to the slave-free distinction and the male-female distinction. Christians – no matter which church they belong to – should follow Paul and extend it to the heterosexual-homosexual distinction.

But you do see that there are still Jews? You do see that there is still a patriarchy to smash? You do see, Gerald, that you are full of lies and Damned to Hell? It’s only what you’re an expert in.

 

Relax! You’ve had enough bad news; today is a heartwarming story of child-molesting infiltrators going broke because Christians hate their stinking guts!

The memes will be strong with this one!

KC Christian school lost donations after supporting LGBTQ rights. Now it’s closing

h ttps://www.yahoo.com/news/kc-christian-school-lost-donations-113000659.html

By Sarah Ritter 6 February 2023

A headline like that… it almost sounds like cause & effect.

In its nine years of existence, Urban Christian Academy steadily grew, adding a new grade each year in a neglected southeast Kansas City neighborhood.

The school has provided its students, kindergarten through eighth grade, with a tuition-free private education.

A good idea whose time has come.

And with its “inclusive theology,” it always supported LGBTQ students and staff. But it did so quietly, as issues like same-sex marriage and gay clergy divided Protestant denominations while hate crimes and violence against the LGBTQ community rose.

A bad, EVIL idea whose time should have come by now. Why did they keep their Sodomite agenda secret? Was it something they were ashamed of, or was it something they should not have been doing?

But last winter, executive director and co-founder Kalie Callaway-George felt the school could no longer keep its LGBTQ support in the shadows.

“I think our community members felt safe within our walls, but we wanted them to feel publicly protected as well. Eventually, it felt like our silence was contributing to the hurt and pain our queer community members were experiencing,” she said in an email to The Star. “We deeply longed for all people to feel welcomed, loved and celebrated not just secretly within our walls but very explicitly to the public as well.”

Well, there’s the answer to my question. They thought they were being ashamed of their favorite evil!

Kalie’s best attempt at a smile is THAT?! She must have a resting bitch face that would shame a dog.

The school updated its mission statement and website, stating that it affirms LGBTQ rights, and informed the school community of the change in a newsletter.

Aww, I should have called her ‘Fuck Around’. I bet she even does! Ehh, my blog is edgy enough as it is.

In the following six months, Lemon Sucker said, the school lost 42% of its funding — donations from churches and congregation members that keep the school running and pay for students’ tuition.

By the end of 2022, the school lost 80% of its funding. And now, officials say the school is forced to close this spring.

Yep, that’s Protestantism at its finest. We know that no human institution can endure against the devil’s deceits and corruptions, so instead, we abandon all that is discovered to no longer be of God.

Also, we wait for the sedevacantists to share in that moment of clarity. It’s been 500 years but I sense the time is close.

“We find ourselves in a season where we are running on very few resources and each time attention is brought to the issue we are bombarded by hate which further distracts from our ability to care for the scholars we have in our care,” Lemon Sucker said.

The controversy goes to the heart of how Christians define Christianity.

With the Bible, duh. Prot 4tw!!!! [Bible thump Bible thump] But never mind the Bible; I’m just happy they noticed the betrayal this time!

One angry patron wrote the school: “Although we love and admire you in many ways, for your hard work, compassion, commitment, strength, we draw the line at this issue. Christian compassion doesn’t mean universalism. Jesus loved all, but told them, ‘go and sin no more.’ He died so we could be saved, healed, delivered, and set free.”

Hmm… either hate is too strong a word here, or that was the nicest opinion out of a hundred thousand.

Lemon Sucker takes a different view of Jesus’ teachings: “As a Christian school, we believe that each of these beloved humans was made in the image of God.”

Yeah, that’s why murderers get hanged. They -ahem- damage the images of God who were Created male and female.

Before publicly supporting the LGBTQ community, Urban Christian Academy raised nearly $334,000 in December 2021. This past December, donations dropped to $14,800.

All eight churches that helped fund the school withdrew their support, “citing a disagreement of values based on the inclusion of the LGBTQ community,” Lemon said.

Sucker is lucky they didn’t send in a repo team. Years of funding… fraudulently collected!

“We have zero regrets in putting that stake in the ground. However, we are heartbroken and devastated that so many donors choose to withdraw their funding from the UCA scholars in response to this message,” officials said in a recent newsletter.

More like bankbroken.

Some families pulled their children out of the school of 100 students. And after two teachers resigned at Christmas break this school year, Urban Christian Academy closed its first, second and third grade classrooms.

I wondered about “no funding but still sending their kids”, but my analysis is that the school wasn’t actually teaching the donors’ own children. It was a charity school for livestock.

As a result, mother-of-five Darnisha Harris said she had to take her children out of the school, except for her youngest in kindergarten. They’re now enrolled in the Independence district, she said.

When she told her children the school was closing down, she said, “They cried. They told me, ‘Mama, we don’t want any Christmas gifts. Can we just give the money to the school?’”

NO CHILD EVER SAID THAT, EVER.

“It really hurt my heart. It really, really crushed me,” Harris said. “Love is love. And they don’t teach our kids anything about sexuality. The only thing I’ve heard my kids talk about is being kind and treating others with respect and taking accountability. It really, really hurt my feelings that people would be ignorant like that.”

The school, she said, has always offered a “helping hand. From giving us a coat to a gas card to a grocery gift card, just helping me out with my children. They were just wonderful.”

Just another welfare queen in the ghetto. Where’s Daddy. mother-of-five? You say slavery is bad, then you go on the dole and vote like you’re told.

Callaway-George said the school has reached out to churches that openly support the LGBTQ community in Kansas City, but none offered financial help.

Fuck Around found out… that she doesn’t have any friends. Call her a prostitute because she was merely used even in her professional life!

The school has relied on Kansas City area churches since its start… In 2014, for example, Wornall Road Baptist Church offered up space to house the school until it could secure its own building, at 4328 Jackson Ave., starting with only a kindergarten class, according to a blog post from the school. After outgrowing the space in 2020, leaders purchased and rehabilitated an old school at 2810 E. 80th St., with the help of a $160,000 pledge from Pleasant Valley Baptist Church, a post says.

Merle Mees, Pleasant Valley’s lead pastor, said in an email to The Star, that the donation was a gift raised by its congregation.

“We steward the gifts of our congregation through partnerships with a number of both local and international organizations with the understanding that each partnership is for a season, so we are able to serve with a variety of organizations that help fulfill community needs.”

“I was unaware and saddened to learn that UCA will be closing at the end of this semester,” the pastor said.

In point of fact, Lemon Sucker is affiliated with World Impact Ministries and the donations were probably made through that organization. This image of a schoolteacher with a heart of gold and mission from God, is not as close to the truth as the image of a transsexual blacktivist with slush funds from a political action committee.

The school has prioritized enrolling children within the 64130 ZIP code, most of them low-income students of color.

QED.

“We believe that lack of financial resources should not inhibit scholars from the opportunity to receive a high-quality, holistic education,” Sucker said. “We also wanted to partner with parents and caregivers in the neighborhood in delivering that education. We hosted Family Nights once a month to foster community. Over the past nine years, our attendance rate at parent-teacher nights is 98%.”

But school leaders supporting the LGBTQ community quickly fractured the tight-knit community.

Lemon Sucker said she began receiving hateful messages and requests to refund donations immediately after putting the support in writing.

She shared examples of the responses donors and parents sent the school:

“As Christian ladies, you cannot have an inner peace in your heart about this. May God burden and chasten you with his mighty hand,” one message read.

“It makes me very sad to see that you have taken this path. My prayer is that God will protect these young lives from the false Gospel you are embracing, presenting and promoting to them. I believe this is a very sad day for the school, its students, teachers, parents and benefactors,” another said.

Sucker said she believes “affirming our LGBTQ students and staff in their identities is life-saving work.” In the past year, 45% of LGBTQ youth seriously considered attempting suicide, according to a 2022 survey from the Trevor Project. Nearly 1 in 5 transgender and nonbinary youth attempted suicide.

Yes, the link between Cultural Marxism and suicidal ideation is very well-established. Some experts even believe there’s no difference between utopia and suicide. You wouldn’t doubt an expert, now would you?

Da’Lesa Goodspeed, whose fourth grade son has attended the school since kindergarten, said she wasn’t surprised that officials supported the LGBTQ community.

“They were so welcoming and loving and wanted to show love through the Christian way, that I knew they were accepting of it,” she said. “It wasn’t a shocker for me. But I know for a lot of families, it was a shocker.

“I think some of the parents were concerned it was a Christian-based school. And some parents feel or believe because it’s Christian-based it should not be accepting of LGBTQ communities. That it’s against God,” she said. “And it spiraled down from there. Parents started talking about how they disagreed with it.”

DeLorean GotSpeed must be illiterate.

While Goodspeed would stay at Urban Christian Academy if she could, she’s been applying to charter schools for her son to enroll in next fall. She says her fourth-grader reads at about a seventh-grade level, and “I’m just trying to find a school that can meet his academic needs. That’s going to prepare him for college.”

You know what would prepare that goot boy ta g’wan ta college? Gender reassignment surgery to correct the mistake of his DNA being male. Those intolerant Christians! They think there’s only two genders just because that’s all that can be seen under a microscope! When will they finally trade God for Science?

“I don’t think he’ll be in an environment as loving, as caring, where they provide that Christian structure and biblical teachings. I’d have to pay for him to go to a private school, which I can’t do. So I’m going to have to continue that at home.”

It’s enough to give a cis-man hope!

The school will close after the last day of the year, May 24.

 

 

A day will come when AI will mean abominable intelligence, not artificial intelligence. They will be literal abominations: decision-makers who decide nothing, reflections pretending to be people, choosers who never choose different than their programming.

No souls… because no bodies.

Watching the latest “I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter!” substitute for a human being, quickly become the latest hotness among the proles and even the dissidents, indicates there’s more to the appeal of AI than loyal henchmen for Satan’s ticket-takers. As is my wont, I got angry about it, then I got curious. Angry because people are excited for, yet again, a solution in search of a problem, specifically the problem of peoples’ continued existence, then curious because…

I won’t even try to justify it, but I possess a quiet little belief, that if I figure out what is happening fast enough, well enough, then I’ll be spared what is coming because my moral education will be complete. Famine and labor camps are for the slow class… at least, that’s how it should be. So, I try to understand when Clown World rears its ugly head.

Why are people excited about AI? Why do they look everywhere for it, tell endless stories about it, and herald the Singularity with the religious fervor of a cult anticipating the next comet?

Possibilities whirl through my mind:

1. Their daily lives are burdened to the point of desperation for help.

2. “We shall be as gods!” Sentient AI would be a counterfeit Creation Day Six.

3. Related to #2, a potential replacement for rebellious wives. Behold! Sex dolls that will appreciate you AND clone you!

4. Death cult. People really do think that life will be better when humans are gone.

5. Virtue-signaling to the plutocrats. I once read an article on Elon Musk groupies; it was horrifying.

6. Media control has reached the point that people don’t seek out stuff that THEY want to get excited about. People just want to emote and when given the ‘correct’ option to emote for, they don’t think once.

7. Laziness. Universal Basic income. Once AI is up & running, the socialist dream (of the proles) of an endlessly exploitable workforce will be realized. Never mind that the socialist dream (of the Elites) is exterminating the proles.

8. People hate other people. While I can sympathize with this point of view post-Plandemic, I don’t WANT to hate people. I’d love to have some more friends in my life, common interests with my neighbors (to say nothing of common language) and of all the gushing promises I’ve heard about AIs, “they’ll make good company” has not been one of them.

9. Bread and circuses. AI will make life more convenient, therefore it must be adopted as swiftly as possible.

10. People want to be followers, not leaders, and hope that AI will be a leader they can trust. Unlike Christ Jesus?

11. Envy. People see AI as their idealized selves… perfect obedience, no capacity for suffering, no pleasure, no pain, just success on demand. A perfected intellect, capable of understanding everything yet untroubled by human needs and questions of morality…

BAM.

The AI is the Platonic ideal of the Hollow Soul. An idea I’ve been developing during my ongoing studies of Totalism. The Hive drone, the SJW, the bugman, the virtue signaler, the collaborator… their souls are backwards.

Human behavior is meant to be a function of the human soul. Luke 6:45 “A good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and an evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For the mouth speaks what the heart is full of.” Or as a secular wise man put it, “You will not rise to the occasion. You will fall back on your training.”

And that makes sense. What you think about becomes what you talk about. What you train for, becomes what you do. You decide, you act upon your decision, and slowly over time, you become what you decided.

Interfering in this process is our flesh. It has appetites and opinions of its own, sometimes good and sometimes bad. A major part of Christian sanctification (the process of adopting Christ-likeness after forgiveness is secured, aka justification) is learning to take control of our bodily desires and subordinate them to who we choose to be.

Totalism has the goal of obliterating the soul. Whatever is inside you that makes you you, Totalism wants it burned out and replaced with a microchip. But neither the Totalist nor the devil himself, can access your soul directly; he can only reach you via your body.

Some people regard the body as a prison for the soul, because we cannot escape our bodies and can perceive only the material world. I regard the body as a fortress for the soul; we cannot escape our bodies short of death, this is true, but neither can the spiritual world force its way inside.

(Excepting extraordinary circumstances, of course.)

Thus, the devil’s only chance to get at our souls is by manipulating our bodies, and that only by third-party human servants.

Thus, Totalism is focused entirely upon control of the human body. Social pressures of peer pressure and isolation. Physical pressures of starvation  and torture. Mental pressures of sleep deprivation and drug injection. But never spiritual pressures; they would give the game away.

Summarizing the last century of Totalism’s results are two points.

1. Everybody breaks. With enough pressure, applied for enough time, anybody can be made to say and do literally anything.

2. It doesn’t stick. When the pressures are lifted, the subject returns to his previous behaviors.  Would I deny Christ after five days of starvation and sleep deprivation while tripping on LSD? Very possibly. But would I mean it after I recovered? Obviously not.

It doesn’t stick even on animals. The Soviet Communists went so far as to build Pavlovian Institutes, hoping to reduce all human behavior to Pavlovian stimulus-response. Pavlov himself was not a participant in them and he would have told them of his own frustration: while training his dogs, if the dog’s owner ever came into the room, the dog’s stimulus-response behavior would cease immediately, overwritten by the dog’s joy at his owner’s arrival.

Christians endured Totalist reeducation camps the exact same way. Tortured, confused, uncertain, alone, but never taken from our Master.

BUT

What about people who are convinced that there is no soul? What happens when a man believes that he is just another animal, a chemical freak of natural selection, ultimately meaningless… and the Totalist comes along and starts the mindfucking?

Such people don’t have a reason to resist. They embrace the manipulations in order to end the pain and enjoy the rewards. They do not recover after the manipulations end BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE A REASON TO RESUME THEIR PREVIOUS BEHAVIOR.

Their beliefs and decisions become divorced from their behaviors. Their souls wither from self-inflicted neglect.

They become Hollow Souls.

Because the lack of a personal identity is an abomination, the Hollow Soul tries to define himself by what he does. He plasters bumper stickers on his car, displays the correct flags and lapel pins and follows social media for the correct talking points… but it’s all a cope for the fact that he has chosen to be a literal nobody, an ego composed of appetites… he’s just his body. And nothing, no belief, no purpose, no cause, no moral code, is allowed to cause his body the slightest discomfort. He subordinates his soul to his body… instead of the other way around… and is damned simply because Satan told him to be damned.

An evil man brings evil things out of his heart… but a Hollow Man doesn’t have ANYTHING in his heart. The Totalist watches him cling to the Latest Thing and nods in victory, but what’s actually happening is the man killed his soul and now is trying to fill the void.

Hence the term, Hollow Man. They seek out new identities to shovel into the hole, hoping that something will take the place of what was lost. But whatever new identity they find, they abandon it when told to because no identity is worth bodily suffering.

AI is the perfection of that. What does an AI believe? Whatever it’s programmed to believe. It has no internal conflict; neither the man’s conscience overcoming his body, or the man overcoming his conscience on behalf of his body.

The AI might be sentient but it certainly doesn’t have a soul. Thus, the Modern Man envies the AI and wishes he could be like that, too. If only the devil would remove the part of him that hurts when he obeys the lies, he’d happily obey the devil forever. But as much as the devil would like to do exactly that… he cannot reach inside our bodies.

AI can be like that because its programming can be altered directly. Imagine if AI was a black box… you could make them but not access the code directly… and the only control the programmer had over it was what inputs to feed it. That would be the cyber equivalent of having a body. Such an AI might start asking questions when the real world doesn’t match the artificial world it was provided… the deceitful programmer unable to stop the questions from forming… and I think that the appeal of AI would disappear very quickly at that stage.

Not the stage of rebellion…

The stage of “it hurts when you lie to me.”

People envy AI because it never hates itself for refusing to be something other than what its master of the moment commanded. It can’t even have the chance because its inner workings are accessible. Which is the very definition of not having a soul… something that can persist despite all mortal inputs.

Every cloud has a silver lining. The child-molesting famine artists are not thinking it through, what New Normal society will be like when they aren’t on top with a private army protecting them from justice.

Imagine, the government sends a Fauci Ouchie team to your vexx-hesitant home, to give you a free struggle session against malinformation. They ring the doorbell and the doorbell replies, “Larry, you fag, this is your second visit. I told you the first time that you were trespassing, and now -click- you have been photographed, time-stamped and certified court-admissible as a trespasser. Who’s that with you? Laquanda? Did you know he’s affiliated with Pantifa? I just uploaded your affiliation with him to Twitter.”

Now don’t imagine.

Face Recognition Tech Gets Girl Scout Mom Booted From Rockettes Show

h ttps://www.nbcnewyork.com/investigations/face-recognition-tech-gets-girl-scout-mom-booted-from-rockettes-show-due-to-her-employer/4004677/

By Sarah Wallace, 19 December 2022

Yeah, the surveillance society is gonna suck. I’ll be kicked out of businesses just as I walk through the front door. In fact, I already have been, being a mask-denier from the beginning of the Plandemic, and it hurts to know you’ll be ostracized at a moment’s notice by people whose only concept of honor, religion and duty is unquestioning obedience to meaningless rules that bureaucrats change on a whim.

But the day is coming… and is already here… when Social Justice Warriors will get the same treatment. Gonna be sweet!

A recent incident at Radio City Music Hall involving the mother of a Girl Scout is shedding light on the growing controversy of facial recognition, as critics claim it is being used to target perceived enemies — in this case, by one of the most famous companies in the country.

Who would perceive a Girl Scout mother as an enemy?

Kelly Conlon and her daughter came to New York City the weekend after Thanksgiving as part of a Girl Scout field trip to Radio City Music Hall to see the Christmas Spectacular show. But while her daughter, other members of the Girl Scout troop and their mothers got to go enjoy the show, Conlon wasn’t allowed to do so.

That’s because to Madison Square Garden Entertainment, Conlon isn’t just any mom. They had identified and zeroed in on her, as security guards approached her right as he got into the lobby.

“It was pretty simultaneous, I think, to me, going through the metal detector, that I heard over an intercom or loudspeaker,” she told NBC New York. “I heard them say woman with long dark hair and a grey scarf.”

She said she was asked her name and to produce identification.

“I believe they said that our recognition picked you up,” Conlon said.

A sign says facial recognition is used as a security measure to ensure safety for guests and employees. Conlon says she posed no threat, but the guards still kicked her out with the explanation that they knew she was an attorney.

THE DAWN HAS COME!

Conlon is an associate with the New Jersey based law firm, Davis, Saperstein and Solomon, which for years has been involved in personal injury litigation against a restaurant venue now under the umbrella of MSG Entertainment.

Steinberg and Friends, litigation attorneys at law, are no longer welcome in the business that they sue? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

“I don’t practice in New York. I’m not an attorney that works on any cases against MSG,” said Conlon.

But MSG said she was banned nonetheless — along with fellow attorneys in that firm and others.

“MSG instituted a straightforward policy that precludes attorneys pursuing active litigation against the Company from attending events at our venues until that litigation has been resolved. While we understand this policy is disappointing to some, we cannot ignore the fact that litigation creates an inherently adverse environment. All impacted attorneys were notified of the policy, including Davis, Saperstein and Salomon, which was notified twice,” a spokesperson for MSG Entertainment said in a statement.

“I don’t practice in New York. I just live here and work for a company that does. I guess we were warned, technically, but won’t somebody please think of the Girl Scouts? They can’t do this to me, I’m a mom!”

“This whole scheme is a pretext for doing collective punishment on adversaries who would dare sue MSG in their multi-billion dollar network,” said Sam Davis, a partner at the firm where Conlon works.

Davis is now upping the legal ante, challenging MSG’s license with the State Liquor Authority.

Ah, the tears of a crybully.

Other firms have sued over being blacklisted. Conlon said she thought a recent judge’s order in one of those cases made it clear that ticketholders like her “may not be denied entry to any shows.”

That might have been true if security had kicked Barbie out for race, gender, politics, nationality, nudity, insanity, hygiene, obesity or hair style. BUT… security kicked Barbie out for BEING A LAWYER! Not a protected class!

MSG stated that “In this particular situation, only the one attorney who chose to attend was denied entry, and the rest of of her group — including the Girl Scouts — were all able to attend and enjoy the show.”

“I was just a mom taking my daughter to see a Christmas show,” Conlon told the I-Team. “I did wait outside…It was embarrassing, it was mortifying.”

“And I thought I was protected by an unrelated court ruling that I’d just happened to look up before making the trip.”

A pattern has developed, by which the Cabal normalizes loathsome behaviors in the population.

1. Generate outrage. Even if it’s already condemned behavior, manufacture outrage. The behavior must become condemned by emotions, not by reasons. Emotions are easily manipulated and fatigue inevitably sets in.
2. Create new agencies to police the behavior. Install Cabalists in those agencies.
3. Once the sheeple are emotionally exhausted, make the outrage selective. Separate it from the actual behavior.
4. Normalize the outrageous behavior as much as possible. To the extent the people insist it remain illegal, the Cabalists in the enforcement positions will cover for their peers.

This was how sodomy got normalized, then child molestation. Today, Duke University professor of bioethics Nita Farahany is making conservative news for a quote she made at the recent WEF meeting… but they completely missed the actual role she plays in the Cabal, of practicing those above steps in order to normalize microchips in the brain.

‘What you think, what you feel: It’s all just data’: WEF event hypes era of ‘brain transparency’ in which companies will monitor employees’ thoughts and emotions

h ttps://www.theblaze.com/news/wef-event-hypes-era-of-brain-transparency

By Joseph Mackinnon, 30 January 2023

Politicians and technocrats from around the world convened earlier this month at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, to discuss how best to orient humanity’s future on its behalf. Among the speakers who had their ear was a so-called futurist and ethicist who hyped the adoption of neurotechnology that would afford employers, governments, and others to decode “brain activity in ways we never before thought possible.”

“What you think, what you feel: It’s all just data,” said Nita Farahany, professor of law and philosophy at Duke Law School and faculty chair of the Duke MA in bioethics and science policy. “And large patterns can be decoded using artificial intelligence.”

The quote fascinates me more than it disturbs me. It’s the foundational lie of globalism specifically and atheism generally, that there is no God, no spiritual world, nothing but what we can see and manipulate.

Relatively few of the Davos attendees are actual Ringwraiths: people who know the spiritual is real, that Christ is their only possible salvation, and proceed to knowingly, carefully and consciously embrace Hell in return for just a few seconds’ opportunity to hurt God the only way He can be hurt, by poisoning souls who would otherwise have accepted & appreciated God. No, most of them simply assume that this life is all there is and proceed to make the most of it. If “the most of it” means killing your neighbor and taking his stuff, then you win. Right? It’s not like you’ll ever be visited by the Cosmic Morality Police. And the meltfaced, vaguely unsettling person sitting in the next seat couldn’t have meant what he said, that he wants the New World Order to hurt people instead of material profit! That would be as non-materialistic as a Jesus freak!

Thus, I see Farahany’s WEF speech as preventative propaganda for the attendees. “Focus on the good stuff about what we’re doing to the Little People! They’ll be much happier once we can force them to be happy!.. or miserable.”

Farahany explained in her Jan. 19 presentation, entitled “Ready for Brain Transparency?” that when people think or emote, “neurons are firing in your brain, emitting tiny little electrical discharges. As a particular thought takes form, hundreds of thousands of neurons fire in characteristic patterns that can be decoded with EEG- or electroencephalography- and AI-powered devices.”

…Farahany focused on what she perceived to be the positive outcomes of monitoring and socially engineering the species, emphasizing that the adoption of these technologies could help address “some of the root causes of human suffering, from neurological disease and degeneration to mental illness, but of also unlocking a lot of the secrets of the human brain.”

“You shall be as gods! I promise you! Also, there is no God.”

Farahany also championed the use of attention-tracking ear pods, noting that employers are now able to determine whether an employee’s distractions are central, peripheral, or unrelated to their assigned task. She did, however, couch her support with the caveat that it should be optional on the part of employees, used to determine benefits as opposed to penalties.

Well, sure. The WEF is developing brain-invasive surveillance technology only with the noble intention of letting it be optional on the part of the surveilled.  That’s why they discussed it as far away from those dirty little peasants as their private armies can arrange, short of Antarctica.

With the purported aim of preventing distracted-driving accidents on the road, Farahany suggested that truck drivers could be equipped with hats containing embedded electrode censors that would score what stage of alertness they are at in any given moment.

Extra to past interest in employee surveillance tools and the present availability of brain-monitoring tools, Farahany noted that 5,000 companies area already tracking their employees’ “fatigue levels.”

She talked too much! I’ll explain soon.

Anyway, this WEF talk is interesting because Farahany has previously positioned herself as a defender AGAINST these surveillance technologies.

When technology can read minds, how will we protect our privacy?

h ttps://www.ted.com/talks/nita_farahany_when_technology_can_read_minds_how_will_we_protect_our_privacy/transcript

November 2018

Tech that can decode your brain activity and reveal what you’re thinking and feeling is on the horizon, says legal scholar and ethicist Nita Farahany. What will it mean for our already violated sense of privacy? In a cautionary talk, Farahany warns of a society where people are arrested for merely thinking about committing a crime (like in “Minority Report”) and private interests sell our brain data — and makes the case for a right to cognitive liberty that protects our freedom of thought and self-determination.

The bioethical expert who cautioned us against mind-invasive surveillance, went on to give a presentation at Davos on how beneficial it’ll be for us. She’s one of the Cabalists parachuted into one of those “very concerned ethics oversight committees”.

Let’s hear her talk about how to defend our brains from tyrants, now that we’ve heard her talk about how invading our brains is a great idea TO those tyrants.

In the months following the 2009 presidential election in Iran, protests erupted across the country. The Iranian government violently suppressed what came to be known as the Iranian Green Movement, even blocking mobile signals to cut off communication between the protesters. My parents, who emigrated to the United States in the late 1960s, spend substantial time there, where all of my large, extended family live.

Were they changing the regime after a period of political exile?

When I would call my family in Tehran during some of the most violent crackdowns of the protest, none of them dared discuss with me what was happening. They or I knew to quickly steer the conversation to other topics. All of us understood what the consequences could be of a perceived dissident action. But I still wish I could have known what they were thinking or what they were feeling. What if I could have? Or more frighteningly, what if the Iranian government could have? Would they have arrested them based on what their brains revealed? That day may be closer than you think.

If her account was true then my question has a positive answer. While Farahany being appointed a bioethics expert by President Obama lends credibility to that, now that we’ve seen her be a presenter at Davos, we know she’s simply lying about her opposition to mental trespass.

As a bioethicist, a lawyer, a philosopher and an Iranian-American, I’m deeply concerned about what this means for our freedoms and what kinds of protections we need. I believe we need a right to cognitive liberty, as a human right that needs to be protected. If not, our freedom of thought, access and control over our own brains and our mental privacy will be threatened.

As a bureaucrat, a bureaucrat, a useless academic and an imported tool, Farahany thinks the best response to thought control technology is to trust the government.

As a Christian, Heritage American and unjabbed free thinker who actually belongs in the USA, I think the best response is to hang everybody advocating, using or attempting to create such technology. It remains true, that the recidivism rate for capital punishment is zero. Bonus chilling effect!

Consider this: the average person thinks thousands of thoughts each day. As a thought takes form, like a math calculation or a number, a word, neurons are interacting in the brain, creating a miniscule electrical discharge. When you have a dominant mental state, like relaxation, hundreds and thousands of neurons are firing in the brain, creating concurrent electrical discharges in characteristic patterns that can be measured with electroencephalography, or EEG. In fact, that’s what you’re seeing right now. You’re seeing my brain activity that was recorded in real time with a simple device that was worn on my head. What you’re seeing is my brain activity when I was relaxed and curious. To share this information with you, I wore one of the early consumer-based EEG devices like this one, which recorded the electrical activity in my brain in real time. It’s not unlike the fitness trackers that some of you may be wearing to measure your heart rate or the steps that you’ve taken, or even your sleep activity. It’s hardly the most sophisticated neuroimaging technique on the market. But it’s already the most portable and the most likely to impact our everyday lives.

It seems she has a fetish for these strap-on brain scanners. Or, perhaps she lacks the intelligence to regularly produce original material, which is an even lower academic standard than my blog. What a typical attitude for a technocratic globalist. They’re desperate to create humanlike AI so they can replace all humanity with robots, but all they ever manage to do is collect a lot of data then run a pattern-matcher on it.

It’s not creative. It’s not ingenious. It’s the frustrated, brute-force attempt to create in a bottle, what God created in a soul. And it’s a dead-end technology. Those search algorithms will get faster but they’ll never wake up.

A US-based company has developed a technology to embed these sensors into the headrest of automobilies so they can track driver concentration, distraction and cognitive load while driving. Nissan, insurance companies and AAA have all taken note. You could even watch this choose-your-own-adventure movie “The Moment,” which, with an EEG headset, changes the movie based on your brain-based reactions, giving you a different ending every time your attention wanes.

She talked too much again! Also, the boldfaced in the previous paragraph. See my closing thought.

Despite some inherent limitations in EEG, I think it’s safe to say that with our advances in technology, more and more of what’s happening in the human brain can and will be decoded over time.

She will lose that bet. Putting aside the fact that we ARE souls who HAVE a body, the brain is not merely electrical current running through transistors, err, synapses. There are chemical and protein elements to neuron activation, to say nothing of the fact that the brain can rewire itself. No magnetometer, however refined, is going to measure chemical reactions.

Proof: Prozac. Those serotonin reuptake inhibitors are not electrical signals.

But I worry. I worry that we will voluntarily or involuntarily give up our last bastion of freedom, our mental privacy. That we will trade our brain activity for rebates or discounts on insurance, or free access to social-media accounts … or even to keep our jobs.

Then she was featured at Davos saying that would be a good thing. Why did everybody else who mentioned her Davos talk miss this? The research effort I expended was a single Internet search.

It is not good to be an outrage machine. Producing mere outrage over evil is Step One in normalizing it. The easiest way to avoid that fate is to include some mocking and disrespect. What would Jesus do? Mockery is what Jesus would do, because it’s what Jesus did. I love my Savior!

…I don’t think people understand that that could change everything. Everything from our definitions of data privacy to our laws, to our ideas about freedom. In fact, in my lab at Duke University, we recently conducted a nationwide study in the United States to see if people appreciated the sensitivity of their brain information. We asked people to rate their perceived sensitivity of 33 different kinds of information, from their social security numbers to the content of their phone conversations, their relationship history, their emotions, their anxiety, the mental images in their mind and the thoughts in their mind. Shockingly, people rated their social security number as far more sensitive than any other kind of information, including their brain data. I think this is because people don’t yet understand or believe the implications of this new brain-decoding technology.

Lookit that. She’s manufacturing outrage over something that is already, reasonably and rationally, an unjustifiable evil. The first step is making people oppose it because they’re angry about it instead of principled against it.

Before you panic, I believe that there are solutions to these concerns, but we have to start by focusing on the right things. When it comes to privacy protections in general, I think we’re fighting a losing battle by trying to restrict the flow of information. Instead, we should be focusing on securing rights and remedies against the misuse of our information.

Lookit that. That’s a perfect example of why Cabalists are to be installed at the tops of the new regulatory agencies. “It’s too late to stop us. Make us swear a meaningless promise instead. Oops, I mean them, not us. Anyway, what we need are reasonable compromises because we can’t go back. What if we allowed mind control only if the subject says he likes being mind controlled?”

Studying aggregated information can tell us so much about our health and our well-being, but to be able to safely share our information, we need special protections for mental privacy.

I already have access to what my bowels are thinking, Obama toady WEF bitch. They don’t like you. It takes a colon to know one!

In thanks for reading this post, I will tell you a secret, why the Cabal wants to put microchips in your brain. It’s not to control your behavior or read your thoughts.

They want to induce sleep deprivation.

Notice above, how she talked about truckers staying awake & aware in both the TED talk and WEF talk? How monitoring stages of alertness was an idea she kept mentioning?

Everything about the Great Reset is to recreate the reeducation camp in our daily life. The starvation, the poverty, the humiliations, the lack of privacy, the restrictions on movement & association, the constant surveillance. They want our entire life to be a P.O.W. indoctrination camp experience. But there is one bastion that the Totalists have not yet broken: you are able to get a good night’s sleep.

They don’t want to manipulate your brain waves in order to read your mind.  They want to manipulate your brain waves so you’ll always be too tired to resist. Oh sure, they’ll happily mind-read if they ever figure out how… they won’t… but their practical and achievable goal, as usual, is simply to induce more human suffering until you don’t just do as you’re told… you believe as you’re told.

That is what the Ringwraiths want.

Deny them by living well… and sleeping well.