A Marxist Word-Spell Invokes Domestic Tranquility

It’s all coming out into the open now… all of True Evil’s skinsuited, vomit-inducing, man-hating, unrepentantly diabolical ugliness…

DIE ALREADY, FEMINIST GRANNYKNOCKERS! You know it’s Clown World when your wife fishes the swimsuit edition out of the trash can you flung it into, and claims she’s only interested in the articles. Female territory marking does not begin to describe this offense against man-kind.

But seriously, I can feel it coming. The dam is breaking. Literal Hell is about to be unleashed and all the dried-up demon prudes are beginning the carnivale.

By way of example, today’s other dried-up demon prude is a retired “religion journalist” teaching the next gun-control word spell to his acolytes. I doubt he’s one of the inner circle, to judge from his lack of competence, which makes it all the more disturbing that he clearly knows what game is being played.

Change the narrative: mass shootings are terrorism

h ttps://www.yahoo.com/news/change-narrative-mass-shootings-terrorism-142626037.html

Opinion for theledger.com by Cary McMullen, 15 May 2023

Consider this scenario. Citizens of a foreign nation are dispersed into our streets and our schools and public places, opening fire with assault rifles, causing multiple fatalities and injuries. Even if these acts were spaced out over months and years, the outrage and the reaction would be swift and unanimous. We are under attack. There would be no barriers to action to redress the crisis.

Uh… we’re not imagining that scenario, and the government’s response has been

…rather than our safety. Behold our cowardly FedGov, importing desperate dirt people to do the jobs that CIA jackboots don’t dare.

One reason the problem of mass gun violence has proved so intractable is how it has been described by gun-rights proponents and the media. Until now, the narrative has been that acts of gun violence are crimes, carried out by criminals or by those with mental health issues. In the wake of the recent Nashville school shooting, U.S. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) said, “Criminals are going to be criminals.”

Duh. By definition, yet again, criminals do not heed inconvenient laws. They also prefer victims who are reliably unable to fight back. Which says everything you need to know about the gun-banners’ defiance of the Second Amendment in order to disarm the productive wealth-creators, aka “lootables”.

Oh, wait. They know this already. I must keep quiet and give Cary the rope to metaphorically hang himself with.

Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors (if there is a surviving defendant) deal with these situations with the tools available to them, as murders or assaults with a deadly weapon. The media, accustomed to covering crimes, follows along with this narrative, using criminal justice terms. It’s processed as a crime; it’s reported as a crime.

It IS a crime and the tools work. The number of perps who got away with their mass murdering is zero. Not counting FBI informants, handlers and/or support staff, obviously, but even they sometimes get caught, too! Looking at YOU, Ray Epps!

No… I must stop… sperging…

To describe the situation this way is to depict it as just part of everyday life, with responsibility falling to law enforcement, mental health counselors, or increasingly, by an armed public. In other words, there is no preventive remedy, only crimes addressed through remedial criminal justice avenues.

But these acts have threatened the fabric of society, so that people are fearful of conducting ordinary commerce, going to mass public events such as football games, or even sending their children to school. If an enemy were to succeed in planting doubt in the mind of the public that it cannot carry on normal activities, they would achieve the objective of weakening us. Without security, society cannot function.

Accordingly, we should no longer treat mass shootings like everyday crimes. Instead, they should be understood as acts of terror – as terrorism.

The sperg in me notices that terrorism is also, in Current Year, an everyday crime.

The Christian in me discerns projection. Terrorism is normal behavior for Socialists. Not us.

And the mocking wag in me, giggles at the idea that Cary is calling for mass shooters to go as unpunished as FBI directors telling Congress where to stick their subpoenas. Nobody goes to jail for terrorism anymore.

Maybe instead, we should punish mass shooters like they were divorced husbands!

Of course, the perpetrators of the overwhelming majority of mass shootings over the past thirty years are not foreign agents or members of a shadowy foreign organization. They are individual American citizens. However, in case after case, their intentions are indistinguishable from, say, al-Qaeda. They are not spontaneous acts of revenge or targeted at individuals against whom they have a grudge. They are not carried out as part of a robbery. Rather, in many if not most cases, they are planned in advance and indiscriminate. Their intention is not to commit a crime but to kill as many people as possible, regardless of age, gender, or social status. Often, they are suicide missions. By any definition, this is terrorism.

None of that is terrorism. You don’t even need violence for terrori–mmfph!

When these acts are characterized as terrorism – carried out against the innocent, and in the case of children the most vulnerable members of society – then we are no longer talking about ordinary crime. Now we are dealing with a matter of national security.

By changing the narrative and the language used to describe the problem, this shifts the ground under the feet of elected officials and lobbyists and forces them to confront the problem as a crisis of national security rather than as a problem of ordinary crime. Politicians would have to defend any opposition to gun control as opposing “domestic tranquility,” as the Prologue to the Constitution has it. And it could compel the national news media to describe these deadly events as the crisis that it is.

There it is. If murder being a crime is not producing the desired political results, then it should be re-branded with a scarier word until the Narrative “compels politicians to defend their opposition to gun control”.

Facts don’t matter. Reality, history and objectivity don’t matter.

Oaths, honor and the rule of law don’t matter.

What does matter, is disarming Heritage America in preparation for our extermination by any lies & deceptions necessary.

And hopefully, what ALSO will matter is some mockery to discredit Cary’s lame-o word-spell. If he doesn’t like his morning “domestic tranquility” interrupted by violent crime then maybe he’s living too close to his Socialist peers?

In war against a nation-state, there would be retaliation, including strategies to disable the enemy’s weapons. In the case of the domestic terrorism of mass shootings, we do have the means of eliminating the weapons used to carry out these attacks, and the crisis demands that we use them. The objective should be clear – the elimination of all assault rifles and handguns in the hands of private citizens, even if this requires a constitutional amendment.

It is urgent that concerned organizations begin to change the narrative of mass shootings. These are acts of terrorism that have produced a national security crisis in America. Let’s call it what it is in order to muster the necessary public will to end mass violence by eliminating weapons of mass destruction.

More like, “let’s call it whatever we need to call it, no matter if it’s true”.

THAT is an act of terrorism by Cary McMullen. He blames the innocent for what the guilty did, and demands the innocent be punished. He doesn’t have to be the one making the threats. He doesn’t have to be the one spilling the blood. He can merely be the one appropriating the crimes in order to make the demands. Even crimes that were not committed for his purpose.

“You’re a terrorist, you law-abiding AR-15 owner! You’re a national security crisis that must be ended forever!”

“Huh? What did I ever do?”

“That lesbian-mestizo child-killer on the far side of the Rocky Mountains disturbed my domestic tranquility. I’ll never have peace until you rot in prison!”

Blaming the innocent for the crimes of the guilty, in order to justify government maltreatment of the innocent, is a terrorist act. It is violence and/or intimidation meant to forward a political agenda. If you don’t see any violence there, then that’s because you don’t expect to be on the receiving end of it.

Peace in our homes, peace in our schools, peace in our streets.

Peace in our time. Peace at any price, excepting Cary’s political ambitions.

Go fuck yourself with your own forked tongue, Cary, like Martha Stewart learned to do in prison. News flash, “it’s out in the open now” means “nobody believes your lies”.

Stop. Disturbing. My domestic tranquility!

3 thoughts on “A Marxist Word-Spell Invokes Domestic Tranquility”

  1. McMullins and Co., are just adding the next necessary layer to the domestic terrorism laws – brought to us by the Orange faced pied Piper.

  2. Martha Stewart? Lol. So since they ruined their reputation by putting trannies into their swimsuit rag a few years back now they have to switch to the boomer market? Hahaha.

  3. Our final goal is the destruction of imperialism, the seizure of power, and the creation of socialism. Our strategy for this stage of the struggle is to organize the oppressed people of the imperial nation itself to join with the colonies in the attack on imperialism. This process of attacking and wrecking imperialism involves the defeat of all kinds of national chauvinism and arrogance: this is a precondition to our fight for socialism.
    The Vietnamese struggle provides a strategic model: as the anti-colonial liberation movement advanced, contradictions within the US heightened, creating more favorable conditions for revolutionary organizing and action, we organized our people and our movement advanced: as anti-imperialist movements gathered strength and moved forward, this aided the Vietnamese who dealt a decisive blow to US imperialism.

    Revolution is a dialectical process of destruction and creation. In the US revolution is intimately bound to the process of defeating imperialism around the world. Any conception of socialism defined in national terms, within so extreme and predatory an oppressor nation as the US, is a view that leads in practice to a fight for particular privileged interest and is a very dangerous ideology. Any combat against enemies is the only solution for socialist revolution in the oppressor nation.

    Socialsim is the total opposite of capitalism/imperialism. It is the rejection of empire and white supremacy. Socialism is the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie, the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and the eradication of the social system based on profit. Socialism means control of the productive forces for the good of the whole community instead of the few who live on hilltops and mansions. Socialism means priorities based on human need instead of corporate greed. Socialism creates the conditions for a decent and creative quality of life for all.

    Billy Ayers, Prairie Fire, 1974, Page 23

Comments are closed.