I don’t do clickbait. The post title is EXACTLY the question I’m asking. Does eating meat protect oneself from demonic influence? This continues my perusal of George Pember’s book Earth’s Earliest Days, a commentary simultaneously untrustworthy, well-intentioned and thought-provoking.
We start with 1 Timothy 4:1-5, NIV translation. The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron. They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth. For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer.
‘Certain foods’ is translated by other works as meat, for example the King James Version, so there’s a little wiggle room. In the context of Current Year, however, we know that our increasingly satanic rulers are very, very keen on stopping people from eating meat… offering alternatives from insects to vat-grown sludges.
We assumed from the start, that the reason they were doing this is simply to weaken the peasants, because animal protein is essential for good health. Just ask a Vegan, and instead of listening to his response, look at that sickly, withered creature who thinks himself the picture of health.
But… what if this not eating meat is something ceremonial? What if the true reason our leaders are banning meat, is to force us into practicing their dark religion?
We know why Satan would prohibit marriage. God created humanity male and female, also marriage between the two sexes, as the earthly metaphor for our divine future between Christ and His people. Trashing that metaphor blinds people to the spiritual reality. If your earthly father is an image of disgust, weakness and henpecked servility, then relating to God the Father will be much more difficult.
Why then, did Paul include dietary abstinences alongside the forbiddance of marriage in his warning against the teachings of deceiving spirits? Are the two of comparable importance? Questions that you never thought to ask. And with the Great Reset’s war on meat underway, it’s time to ask.
Pember’s main theory is that the body is a prison for our souls… we are not capable of interacting with the spirit world while housed inside our flesh… but also, that our bodies are fortresses against the spirit world… it cannot reach us directly. Only via the mortal world.
To weaken the body, then, is to weaken our natural defenses against spiritual contamination. To thin the barrier between reality and Beyond. A scene that comes to mind, is Jesus’ Temptation after forty days of starvation. I always thought that was to set up the first Temptation of food… but what if that level of bodily weakness was needed for Satan to be able to speak to Jesus directly in the first place?
Pember went on to document how Spiritists, Theosophists, Buddhists etc. would use meatless diets as ways to make connections to the spiritual world or develop sorcerous abilities. The mechanism of it was to weaken the body enough that its defenses against interaction with the spiritual could be overcome. Once breached, those defenses are never again as effective.
While I still haven’t grokked the significance of 5G graphene nanoparticles, etc., the Enemy has openly fantasized about its Internet of Things morphing into the Internet of Bodies. Their lying promise is that we’ll be able to know and control everything… but it’s not a hard stretch that their true goal might be to defeat the human body as a fortress against direct spiritual assault.
I shudder to imagine the fates of people who, having lived most or all of their lives in a society of moral inversion, without the concept of Evil except as a cartoonish half-goat with a pitchfork and a MAGA hat, getting holes drilled not just into their brains but into their souls.
Meat is not magically special. We have the example in Early Daniel, when Daniel successfully objected to the rich foods they were being given, with the result they were fed vegetables instead. Paul is on record in Romans saying he’d never eat meat again before he lets his behavior weaken another man’s ability to believe.
Neither are our bodies ideal defenses. Scripture is full of warnings that we must learn to control our bodies and discipline its appetites. There is a parallel for what Pember is describing in human sexuality. People who indulge that appetite, going from bad to worse, have ended up in rebellion against the concept of humanity being male & female… and upon reaching that state, easily became fleabags for unclean spirits.
Perhaps the Elite corruption of our diet is to accomplish the same result as promiscuity. Not everybody is willing to fornicate freely, after all. Even the atheists have the strong motivation of avoiding venereal diseases.
We have a contemporary example of Elites forcing us to practice their religion in the face diaper. The lie of it was that masks don’t keep you safe; they keep everybody else safe from you; therefore, anybody who went maskless was trying to harm the people around him; therefore, Good People get to police their neighbors and force them to obey the rules.
That’s not medicine. That’s population control. Medicine is how to heal the self, not how to manipulate others for personal benefit. Exactly the Hive mentality that permeates the, well, Hives of Marxism, exported by force of law onto people ill-equipped by ignorance to recognize the new evil.
Eat the meat. Live in Creation. Associate with what God has given us, accepting it with thanksgiving. Do not eat the bugs, do not climb into the pod and do not love life more than truth.
If our churches stubbornly insist upon being centers of wellness rather than sin & repentance, the least they could do is teach proper & healthy maintenance of the body along with offering healthy foods in defiance of the Great Reset.
“Meat is not magically special. We have the example in Early Daniel, when Daniel successfully objected to the rich foods they were being given, with the result they were fed vegetables instead. Paul is on record in Romans saying he’d never eat meat again before he lets his behavior weaken another man’s ability to believe.”
Something I have some experience with. You’re right, meat is not magically specially. (I personally don’t know of any magic foods.) But it IS nutritionally special, in that mammal meat like beaf, lamb, goat, etc. is very nutritionally dense.
So NOT eating meat is a sacrifice. How else can we possibly view it?
In Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, “fasting” is equated to not eating meat (The EOs also skip cheese and eggs!).
St. Paul’s comment in Romans brings to mind this very sacrifice, this very suffering. Pennance! Hardship! Crucify the old man! Not some kind of lifestyle in perpetuity. Even monks and nuns don’t always abstain from meat.
Your scripture reference tells us Saint Paul would rather not eat meat (suffer! sacrifice!) than cause someone to sin. It wasn’t his preferred diet, it was denial of himself in order to help a weaker-in-faith brother/sister. Similarly, Daniel and his cohorts did a vegetable FAST. It was, again, a sacrifice. Suffering offered up to the glory of God.
Feasting in the Bible is the equivalent of eating meat. Fat of the lamb. The fattiest part of the bull being burnt on the altar. Etc. The Pentateuch just goes on and on about this stuff. Slog through reading Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, etc. IF you can!
In OT and NT faith traditions, NOT eating meat is a sacrifice. I cannot see any contrary interpretation being tenable in light of voluminous scripture.
The globalists want us to sacrifice in perpetuity. To our detriment. Because meat is healthy. Please excuse my long-winded comment.
In the Bible also not eating meat is fasting. John the Baptist is considered to be perpetually fasting but he does eat…bugs and honey.
Strangely the Left likes fasting but hates celibacy. Even if they command to abstain from both meats AND marriage its not for sexual purity but for sexual impurity. One of the reasons ascetics abstained from meat in ancient times was a superstition that eating meat made you more lusty and thus remaining celibate was easier if you didn’t eat meat. But they were wrong. The effect they noticed was caused by zinc not meat per se, and there are vegetables that have the same effect (refilling the balls fast). The strengthening of the mind meat provides outweighs the wet dream anyway.
In Roman and OT terms, gods or angels attend sacrifices (outdoor barbeques) as when the “birds” ate Abraham’s sacrifice. But in Buddhist terms the gods hate the smell of people who eat meat. So there is some sort of opposite thing going on here. According to the one, eating meat attracts benevolent forces of good, and according to the other repels them. Confucius may be categorizable with the Western side since he maintains a “gentleman” must keep up the “rites” which undoubtedly includes animal sacrifices. No wonder China has no problem eating meat, but takes it a bit too far with rats and bats.
Although this anti-meat thing in Buddhism seems to be a post-Buddha creation due to him saying to Ananda that the so-and -sos (Likhavis or Videhans, I can’t remember) will remain prosperous so long as they keep their ancestral laws and do not change them—and those surely included animal sacrifice.